Midjourney vs Leonardo AI (2026) — Honest Comparison
Quick Verdict
Our pick: Midjourney for professionals, Leonardo for everyone else. Midjourney produces the most aesthetically polished AI images available. Leonardo's free tier (150 generations/month, no watermarks) makes it the practical choice for most people. Unless image quality is your product, Leonardo is the smarter pick.
| Midjourney | Leonardo AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $10-60/mo | Free (150/mo) / $12+ mo |
| Free tier | None | ~150 gens/month, no watermark |
| Image quality | Best in class | Very good |
| Interface | Discord + web | Web app |
| Models | Proprietary | Multiple (including community) |
| Text in images | Poor | Poor (use Ideogram instead) |
| Commercial use | Yes (paid plans) | Yes (most outputs) |
| Learning curve | Moderate | Low |
| Batch generation | Yes | Yes |
| Image editing | Limited | Yes (canvas, inpainting) |
Detailed Breakdown
Image quality: Midjourney is the benchmark. Better lighting, composition, color grading, and overall aesthetic coherence. When you see an AI image that makes you stop scrolling, it's usually Midjourney. Leonardo is close — genuinely good — but side-by-side, Midjourney's output has more visual polish.
The gap is narrowing. A year ago, it was obvious. Now, for most use cases (social media, blog images, marketing materials), Leonardo's quality is more than sufficient.
Free tier: This is Leonardo's killer advantage. 150 free generations per month with no watermarks and commercial use. Midjourney has no free tier at all — you're paying from day one. For anyone evaluating or using AI images casually, Leonardo wins by existing at $0.
Interface: Leonardo is a clean web app. Upload reference images, adjust settings, generate, edit, download. Standard and intuitive.
Midjourney started on Discord (confusing for non-Discord users) and now has a web interface. The web version is better but still less polished than Leonardo's. The Discord workflow remains available for power users who prefer it.
Editing capabilities: Leonardo includes a canvas editor with inpainting (edit specific parts of an image), outpainting (extend the image), and image-to-image transformation. Midjourney's editing is more limited — variations, upscaling, and basic style adjustments.
If you need to iterate on and refine images within the same tool, Leonardo has better built-in editing.
Model variety: Leonardo offers multiple AI models including community-created fine-tunes. Want anime style? There's a model. Photorealistic portraits? Different model. This flexibility means one subscription covers more use cases. Midjourney has one model — it's excellent, but it has one visual signature.
Our Pick
Leonardo for most people. The free tier is genuinely useful, the quality is good enough for 90% of use cases, and the editing tools add real value. Unless you're a creative professional whose reputation depends on image quality, Leonardo delivers more value per dollar (especially at zero dollars).
Midjourney for professionals. If clients see your AI-generated images, or if visual quality directly impacts your revenue, the premium is worth it. The aesthetic difference is real, even if it's shrinking.
Built an AI image tool?
Submit it to our directory — it's free